What Homosexuals Do (It's More Than Merely Disgusting) Page: 2 of 3
1 pamphlet : ill. ; 22 x 51 cm., folded to 22 x 11 cm.View a full description of this pamphlet.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Throughout recorded history, all civilizations and
major religions have discriminated against homosex-
uality ". In Puritan New England, conviction of a
homosexual act was a capital offense. Thomas
Jefferson believed that homosexuality "should be
punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by
cutting through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one-
half inch in diameter at least."'9 Until 1961 every state
in the U.S. discriminated against homosexuality. Was
such discrimination based upon reason or prejudice?
Gays claim that:
1) they are discriminated against solely
because they are different,
2) these differences result in no rational set
of harms, and therefore
3) society is acting prejudically against them.
Discrimination against murderers and drug users is
considered non-prejudical because society is adverse-
ly affected by their acts. How about homosexual be-
havior - does it harm the actors and/or endanger the
community?
Gay Sex Is Anti-Biologic Sex
The recent literature regarding homosexual
activities and its correlates is summarized in Table 1.
Gay activities are not only unsanitary and disgusting
but monumental assaults on the human body.
Homosexuals admit to fellating almost every one of
their sexual contacts (and ingesting semen from about
half of these 16). Seminal fluid contains virtually every
germ carried in the blood, thus gays are essentially
consuming raw human blood with all its attendant
medical risks. Many, perhaps most 16, homosexual con-
tacts involve kissing and consequent salivary exchange.
A very large fraction of both sexual and non-sexual
diseases can be transmitted via saliva. Since most
homosexual exchange occurs between strangers (70% of
gays estimated that they had had sex only once with
over half of their partners 17), and gays average some-
where between 20 (Table 1) and 106 16 different
partners/year, the potential for infection and trans-
mission is considerable.
The next-most-common gay sex act is rectal
intercourse. It too is fraught with biologic danger. First,
the anus must be lubricated enough to allow penetra-
tion of the penis. Often fingers and/or tongue are used
to stretch and moisten the opening. Saliva or an artifi-
cial lubricant is employed to make the event possible.
Saliva contains many germs and substances foreign to
the rectum. Artificial lubricants are easily
contaminated and their long-term health effects on the
rectum and in interaction with the blood are unknown.
Tearing or bruising of the anal wall (which is only one
cell thick) during anal/penile sex is almost inevitable. If
'toys' are employed (homosexual argot for variousTABLE 1
Gay Activities and Diseases (in %)Activities
oral/penile*
anal/penile
oral/anal*
fist in rectum**
Urinating on/in
each other
sadomasochism**U.S." U.S.' U.S.2/
Canada3
1940s 1977 '83/'84
ever ever ever
&3 99 100/99
68 91 93/98
59 83 92/92
22 41/47Other Signs of
dyshealth
sexually trans-
mitted disease
Illegal dnig use
carrier of enteric
parasites
travel to U.S. in
past year (avg.
stay 5 weeks)
With whom sexrelations
ever minors
# partner/yr
% ever in orgies37 >.23
> 20
61 76U.S.'
1983
last yr
99
95
63
34Den- U.S.
mark4
1984 1983
last yr. last mo.
86
92 9578/70
90 69
25 5946/
10/24
88/Where sex
occurred
public restrooms 14 41 66/
gay baths 9 60 67/*unhealthful with multiple partners
**unhealthful per se
objects which are inserted into the rectum - - sometimes
bottles, carrots, lightbulbs or especially designed
devices) the risk for contamination is also considerable.
Thus, via the anus: 1) foreign saliva and its germs
and/or some artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own
feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or subtances the
penis has on it (often it will have recently been in
another mouth or anus), and 4) the sperm and seminal
fluid of the inserter gain direct access to the bloodstream. Not before 1984 15 was it discovered that
sperm readily penetrate the anal wall and cause
massive immunological damage to the body's T- and B-
cell defensive systems (sperm cannot penetrate the
multilayered vagina) and soon render the participant
immunologically compromised - set up for a host of
insidious infections. Further, the penis of the inserter
bears some risk of infection. About half of all male
syphilis is carried by gays as a rectal infection and the
fecal material into which he is plunging can enter his
body through his urethra. Since gays masturbate about
twice as much as heterosexuals 2 and many take drugs
to prolong their erections, the penis is often bruised or
cut before or during these activities, so infection via
the mucous membrane and/or bruises or cuts is a
considerable risk. Over 90% of gays regularly
participate in this bit of biological insanity.
While even a schoolboy knows not to eat human
waste, about two-thirds of homosexuals regularly lick
and/or insert their tongues into the anus of their 'lovers'
and thus ingest biologically significant amounts of
feces. Because they usually don't know where the penis
they fellate has been recently, many of those fellators
who don't participate in anal-licking unwittingly end
up consuming feces as well. While the human body has
defenses against it, exposure to the fecal discharge of
dozens of strangers is patently unhealthful and unwise.
As homosexuality has become more open,
proliferation of anti-biologic activity has flourished. By
1983 well over a third of gays admitted to participation
in fisting (inserting the hand and arm, sometimes up to
the armpit, into the rectum of sex-partners). This absur-
dity was so rare in Kinsey's time he didn't even think to
ask about it. The rectum was not designed to
accomodate the hand and arm - - over time many of the
fools that engage in this stupidity find their sphincter
weakened to such a degree that they 'dribble' at incon-
venient times. The trend in Table 1 is fairly clear.
Urinating on and/or torturing 'lovers' for sexual sport
appears to have at least doubled in incidence since the
1940s, and fisting has increased astronomically.
Further, the first national random study of gay sexual
practices 2 found 17% admitting to eating and/or
rubbing themselves with the feces of partners and an
additional 12% reported giving and receiving enemas as
part of sexual pleasure!
Although gay estimates of 'numbers of partners per
year' might strike the average person as outrageous
enough, the only study that had homosexuals keep a
sexual diary suggests that the estimates are too low 16
Whereas gays had estimated about 60 partners/year,
the diaries suggested that the real figure was closer to
100! Some of this may relate to the use of the word
"partner". To a heterosexual, "partner" usually means
anyone with whom one has sexual relations - - but manygays don't count bathroom, gloryhole or peepshow
'tricks' since they often can't even see the person with
whom they are having sex (sometimes they can't even
see the organ). Possibly the estimates in Table 1 should
be doubled to accord with empirical reality. Whatever
the case, the diary study indicated that, on-average,
gays:
1) fellated 106 different men, and swallowed
50 of their seminal discharges,
2) experienced 72 penile penetrations of the
anus, and
3) ingested the fecal material of 23 different
men . . . per year.
It is readily apparent why 7% acquired hepatitis A and
10% hepatitis B in the 6 month period of the study.
Gay activist and chairman of the American Psycho-
logical Association's ethics committee, Dr. Morin,
reported that his study of 824 gays indicated that fear
of AIDS had lowered their sex-rate from 70 different
partners a year in 1982 to 50 by mid-1984.20
Fresh Germs From Around The World
The garden variety sexual practices of homo-
sexuals are a medical horror story - salivary exchange,
seminal/blood exchange and mixing, fecal exchange,
rectal trauma - with dozens of different men each
year. Worse, many, if not most of these encounters
occur while the participants are drunk, high on drugs,
and/or in an orgy setting. Additionally, many of these
sexual encounters occur in extremely unsanitary
settings (bathrooms, gay baths, dirty peep shows). As if
this were not enough, notice the 1984 Denmark study
(column 5 in Table 1). About a quarter of these homo-
sexuals visited the U.S. during the last year. Almost all
had visited New York and many had gone on to San
Francisco and other U.S. cities. They shared their fresh
Danish parasites with U.S. gays and took home fresh
U.S. pathogens (AIDS, of course, went with them).
Foreign homosexuals visit the U.S. daily and mix their
germs with our locals' supply (the AIDS cases in
Europe appear to have been carried from us to them in
just this way). The rate of world-traveling for
American homosexuals is comparable. The gay 'sex
hunt' is growing and encompassing a greater variety of
bodies.
Gays are an octupus of infection stretching across
the world. Fresh, undiluted germs are its daily food
and excrement. Most gays are veritable Typhoid
Marys, pursuing and being pursued by others as bio-
logically lethal as themselves and having sex in settings
unrivaled for stupidity and squalor.
Earning Their Infections
AIDS started receiving massive publicity in 1981.What, aside from demanding government research and
treatment money, has been the reaction of
homosexuals? Bear in mind that AIDS is one of, if not
the, worst communicable diseases to get. It can't be
cured and victims die a miserable death soaked in fever
and diarrhea. A smoker who ends up with lung cancer
after 20 or 30 years of plying his habit is unfortunate,
but he 'earned his disease'. Everyone knows that
smoking is injurious, including the smoker. Likewise
with gay sexual practices - - you'd have to have been
raised in a jar not to know that promiscuous
fecal/rectal/oral sex was bad for you. Did
homosexuals stop their odious sexual practices until
they knew how AIDS was being transmitted? It would
have been the rational thing to do, of course, but could
people with such a captivating set of bad habits stop?
Anyone who has worked with smokers or alcoholics
knows the most likely answer is "no" - - and so it has
been with homosexuals. In 1978, 1% of the gay blood
tested in San Francisco evidenced infection with the
putative AIDS retrovirus HTLV-III. By 1980, 25% of
gay blood showed infection with AIDS, and in 1984,
three years after the alert and massive public health
warnings - after the expenditure of millions and mill-
ions of tax dollars on 'educating the gay community'
-after all this, 65% of gays tested exhibited infection
with the AIDS pathogen! 3 14 Our best information sug-
gests that by mid-1984 over half of the homosexuals in
San Francisco had infected themselves with AIDS. The
proportions are likely to be as high as New York City,
Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Dallas and other 'gay
centers' and perhaps a little lower elsewhere.
What gays do sexually is unsanitary insanity. The
numbers with whom they perform their deeds is
incredible. In the face of perhaps the world's worst
disease gays have continued their disgusting practices
until perhaps half of them evidence infection with the
AIDS virus.
Homosexuals have ridden into the dawn of sexual
freedom and returned with a plague that gives every
indication of destroying them and, perhaps, the rest of
humanity. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great
risk (in just the last two years, at least 24 hospital
employees in one NY hospital group have received
needle-stick injuries while working with AIDS
patients 10 - - how many of these will come down with
the disease will only be known some years from now,
but from the apparent fact that one sex act 1s and
possibly one use of an infected needle can transmit
AIDS, the odds are against them). Obviously, if about
half of gays are carriers of AIDS in 1984, anyone
working on a homosexual's body (as a dentist, nurse,
mortician) runs some unknown risk of infection.
Currently, the AIDS pathogen appears to be of low
infectivity, but one cannot be sanguine about the
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This pamphlet can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Pamphlet.
Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality. What Homosexuals Do (It's More Than Merely Disgusting), pamphlet, 1985; Lincoln, Nebraska. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276165/m1/2/: accessed May 19, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Special Collections.