Sayles and Sayles Collection - 2,680 Matching Results

Search Results

Cause No. 11551: Plaintiff's Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 11551, Tomlinson, Paschall & Colvin vs. The Independent Torpedo Company, detailing the complaints of Mollie Lee Tomlinson, W. R. Tomlinson, Crigler Paschall, and J. D. Colvin against the Independent Torpedo Company. The plaintiffs seek recourse for damage to their oil well in Erath County, Texas by the shooting done by the Independent Torpedo Company.
Date: unknown
Creator: Chastain & Judkins
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Deposition of J. H. Rapp]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon Jr. vs. United States Torpedo Company, transcribing the deposition of Jack H. Rapp. Rapp's testimony discusses his association with the United States Torpedo Company and his shooting of an oil well in Eastland County, Texas.
Date: October 16, 1925
Creator: Cunningham, Tom J.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Oral Deposition of B. C. McDonald, October 17, 1925]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon Jr. vs. United States Torpedo Company, transcribing the deposition of B. C. McDonald. McDonald recounts his recollections regarding the shooting of an oil well by J. H. Rapp in Eastland County, Texas. There is a receipt from the United States Torpedo Company included in the document.
Date: October 17, 1925
Creator: Cunningham, Tom J.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Second Original Petition]

Description: Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. and Frank R. Ellis vs. United States Torpedo Company, describing Hamon and Ellis's complaints of the torpedo company and listing the damages they claim they are entitled to. The suit regards damage to Hamon's and Ellis's oil well in Eastland County, Texas caused by a representative of the United States Torpedo Company.
Date: 1925~
Creator: Sayles & Sayles
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Cause No. 12096: Original Answer of Defendant, W. Parmill]

Description: Document in cause no. 12096, O. M. England et al. vs. Edwin B. Cox et al., detailing W. Parmill's answer to the plaintiff's petition. The answer denies the alleged trespass and states that the plaintiff's complaint is regarding events more than two years previous to the filing of the suit.
Date: March 2, 1926
Creator: Stringer, S. D.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen