The Weekly State Gazette. (Austin, Tex.), Vol. 17, No. 39, Ed. 1 Saturday, June 16, 1866 Page: 2 of 4
four pages : ill. ; page 22 x 17 in. Digitized from 35 mm. microfilm.View a full description of this newspaper.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Count
i'S-'í
I - '
Qip'i
A * ■ ■;
iW
' McLetma:
$¡¡mm
ounty.
judioial district,
W&mm'M
ton senator,
mgm
•~MS=
2CTH distbiot,
=5=5
avion
atrio*.
.—«me «r
¡Dotted Stele* mud
r (he Repreaentailves
the people ta Con-
■ uwmbM. will
e «donante to the
at the «aoin
■I ' * ÍtIÍ1S¡^
pan
not have for it* object ti
gw*^hhhiiiw
the nominee of a radical cauco ? And
does he not itand out as plainly and a*
unq
party as any other candidate on the
of that anti-whi teman par-^
iOHBML'i-.Jftl..
peat, what was the object of that
correspondence'? Was it not to discover
whether or pot the sentiments of the two
were not identical and equally unobjec-
tionable to the radical party 1 Why is
it not laid before the people of the Dis-
trict who are tbe'interosted parties 1
Is it designed fhat Jndge McGinnis
g «hall bushwhack the District, shoestring
every question, run on every side of every
question, take the political color of every
man whom he buttonholes, and, at the
same time, receive the vote o£ the whole
radical party'/ It would seem so, from
the game which is being played; and
I sap%iwhen the votes are cast, and he elected—,
®MÍÉ¡jÍ? if such should be the misfortune of the
The President in . people of the District—his election will be
! publish-
nam
m
fujuduoienlat Rio man
ceí approve <>r my pel-
ley and that ©rc..u«re
at the u<me time. That
U iaiiKwdble. In Now
Hampshire It waa
claimed that both polt'
ctea were Dupptiried,
which, of eourae, could
not be; but after the
eleeilon It was claimed
that a H&dEval victory
had been achieved
He trusted the people
would not turn bet tie-
:«éB5E í'
tiling
iMSS
It will bo seen that here the President
charges the Texas Radicals with prac-
leception on the people.
We learn that this gentleman, wha is
umpitig this Senatorial District, is
a favorable impreeSion Wherever
he goes, Mr. Shelley Is plain and- out-
spoken on all the issues of the day. -He
w Conservative Dillon man in the ful-
lest sense of that term. We earnest!
vote inpjiis Distriot. Not Having con-
cealed any of his opinions or dodged or
evaded any Question, ho will get no rad-
ie*! votes. That party will, no doubt,
use it influence to elect hia opponent
They cannot do it without the aid of Con-
servative v<ate6. We trust our Cotweiv
ative friends see sufficl
el Shelley a cordial and general support.
- Whet the views of his competitor are we
cannot exactly say; we judge him more
from his supporters than any thing else.
We prefer a roan whoso views we know.
n these issues we know where General
Shelley Is.
spss
M4ém
■. 1 W
t&Tp.'iW
Concentration.
llf
, and the
p.. -.a ;
m§ *"•
time since, in view of the num
at Conservative Union candidato
lltufci, especially in
''——ount impor-
ection of a
i, we ventured to give some advice,
we trusted would be kindly re-
*od carried into effect, Wore-
candidates tbara-
and amicably ar-
which should be
caudidate of the Conservative Union
eourtl not be done, then
for their mutual friends
decide tho matter. We regret to
that neither one nor the other has
done. On the contrary, the num-
increased.
y of Travis,
I v her of candidates has
I ¿Í"¿tjml
ve Union
while the Radicals have
It requires no-prophet to foretel
RadioO*«#adidato. will
a doubt, unless the
rote ii
one of the five* The election
claimed as a radical triumph, and will be a
radical triumph b* fact.
We again tell tho people not to bo de
celved. Judge McGinnis is to-day and
has been for ton days past the radical can-
didate for Judge of the 2nd Judicial Dis-
,trkst.&| Facte—the concealments of the
party ot which he is a candidate—his own
concealment of the contents of his an-
swer to the nidical questioning partly
which interrogated Judge McFurland and
himself—the conferences which took
place between him and " open eyed, res-
olute radicals " in this city, jftst prior to
Judge McFarland's withdrawal, ail point
to one main tact, and that is, that in ad
dition to carrying wator on both shoul-
ders, as he was doing before, ho has stop-
pod into Judge McFarland's shoes and is
now hobbling along in them.
This is no time for men, who
seek popular endorsement, to avoid the
full and fair expression of their sentiments.
There is nothing to be ashamed of, in
giving a hearty and unqualified support
to Gen. Throckmorton for Governor, and
^ffi^ie^oM^vatíve^^el^
for Judgos of the Supreme Court. They
aro, each and all, the friends of the pdople,
and the advocates of Constitutional lib-
erty. Can so much be said of tho party
which so violently and uncompromisingly
opposes them ? We unhesitatingly say
no. for, in truth, there is much to binsh
for when the principles of th^t party are
honestly exposed, and the animus of its
leaders candidly expressed. Hamilton,
Degeoer, Davis, Flanagan and Rob Tay-
lor, are men who have so little of sítame,
that they can express themselves openly
and coldly, without a blush tinging their
stained cheeks. While others, who op-
pose the Conservative Union party, may
not be, and doubtless are not. a devoid
of respect for the i eopie of the South;
for th% people among whom thoy live;
still, Uf tbey follow the lead of the
above named Radicals, only a little fur-
ther, they will soon learn that tbey can
speak and slater our noble people, and
not blush at tho crime, with equal facil-
ity to eithor Hamilton, Degeuer or Flan-
agan. But we are led away from the
subject, upottffjjKrhich we would speak to
the people of this District,
If gentlemetsá'will not publish this
noted correspondence, of which we have
spoken, will they, and among them Judge
McGinnie, answer this question :§|1 ' |
Did not Judge McGinnis say, in his
«nrtrer to the query addressed to him—
That he had intended to vote for Col.
Jones for Lt. Governor, but that Cob
Jones had made a remark in his Bastrop
spfcech, which had driven him (Judge
McG) even from the support of Col.
Jones, or words to that effect? And
men^and in making a selection, we should
choose that one (other thing* being equal)
who will be able to <*rry the most
strength with him. Of tbeso we feel sat-
isfied that Maj. Willie is tfce strongest
aud that the popular voice seems to point
in that direction. Next to him, Ju
Cleveland seems to be the favorite. Mty.
Willie was our first choice, but we are,
by no means, blind to -the qualifications
of Judge Cleveland, and we . would have
yielded our preference and supported him
had we deetnedJt necessary
tmsa of tiao ticket. tt is,
think that Judge Clevelend stands a
ghost of a chance, and we shall, therefore,
vote for Maj. Willie for tho'vacant p'ace
on the regular ticket. The Telegraph
has made a very indiscreet, and we feel
certain, unauthorized effort to Imkjthe
fortunes of Mqj. Willie, with thotis of
Judge Cleveland, It has asserted,
with the consent of these gentlou™,
their friends will vote for each other, Ud
each make war ,on the regujar ticket fbr
the purpose of defeating Judge SmithJ
We doubt if either of these gentlem
feel gratoful to t|ie Telegraph for this
nouncoment. Wo have no means
knowing what Judgo Cleveland's vie'
are—though it may be that weknow bin
quite as well, perhaps better, than tb
Telegraph. As for Maj. Willie, having
known him long and intimately, and hav-
ing met bitnsince his visit to Houston, we
feel authorized in sayiug tbat he has
furmed no such coalition. He is nota
party to the ungenerous war now being
waged by the Telegraph on Judge Smith.
Maj. Willie is running on his own strength.
He neither needs nor desires any such co-
alition ais the Telegraph announces to ex-
ist. We have no hostility to Judge
Cleveland j but for the last four weeks it
Willie was
the 1
tad
t alluded to the fate
its action, in
•ral matter
the majority of
,ly desired to do bre"ac'
or necessary to
in order to restore tho State to
■I relations with the Union. A«
have been expected, there was a
fee of opinion among the members
i important subjects, particularly
be form of expression in rescinding I
i of Secession. The Judge
ife of those, who wished to declare
. ek initio. After much debate, an
nee was adopted, which, though,
■ little equivocal in phraseology;
both.
IMP
He* wouli
has been evident that Maj.
the favorite. If Judge Cleveland came
out under the impression, as the Tele-
graph intimates, that Judge* Smith bad
no strength, the popular demonstrations
should h^ve satisfied him, ere ttys, that
he was most egregionsly mistaken-
There is a fixed pur^stt^ and a wise pur-
pose, too, on the part of our people, to
bury deep in the waters of oblivion, all
past party prejudices—to welcome to our
ranks all original Union men who propose
battle for the Constitution, and the rights
of the States thereunder, for which the
forces oa each side are now marefulling.
The defection of Judgo Smith, Mr. Ep-
person and others, from the Pease party,
was one of tho deadliest biows that that
party received in this Stat . Judge
'Smith has declared his purpose not to
fight under their banner. We have agreed
to join with him in this eoptest against
them- After having thus solemnly bu-
ried with him the hatchet and smoked
the calumet of peace, shall We basely mur-
dor him in the bouse of hia friends 1-
Wbo is that gives, in a great measure,
thjs'ipí. was satisfactory ;«Ó'pkppith
regard to the repudiation of; the war
dobt, there was but little difference of
Option. He opposed tho repudiation of
thej Civil Debt of the State, as he still
thought, for good reasons. The amount
of fite dobt had been greatly exaggerated
It ra not more than $500,000, perhaps
smtjll as $300,000, and justice and good
fkith r*|f$fed it payment. A majority
of the Convention, however, thought
otherwise, and the question was settled
and not now before the people. Tho ac-
tion of the Convention, on the negro
question and school fund, Received his
saastion and went as far as he was wil-
ling to go- The freedom of the slave"
had'been acknowledged; their persons
and property put under the protection of
law; they could testify " "
wherein they were Interested, agd power
was;given the Legislature, hereafter, to
enlarge this right, if it might bo deemed
proper. The school fund belonged to the
whites, anil the negroes had no claim on
It. He was pot opposed to the educa-
tion of the blacks, and be was willing
that yankee school inarms, &s many as
leased, should cyme and teach tbem,
md few, he thought, would have any ob-
jection to this, particularly if they were
¡young and pretty.
The Judge expressed himself stropgly
it) favor of the amendments to the Con-
stitution, increasing the terms of office,
and salaries of the Judges and State offi-
cers. "The laborer was worthy of hi
hire," and he believed in paying well tbe
right kiud of men, and the right kind
dbuld not be bad without. Thoy must
have something more than a bare subsis-
tence. Salaries should be such that
. men, wfco -trwe
t*r
f. he was
not ''
Committee or any -- -
propositions yet made by the Congress.
Tbey were unjust and degrading to the
South. The President bad assured him,
that when tho State of Texas had been
organized and prepared for it, bo would
er the Provisional Government to
'eminent established by the peo-
plo 'of Texas under their Constitution.
Under our State Government, if we
elected the right men, we could get
along very well, if tbe Congress persist-
ed in refusing us representation. Thus
'situated, be would wait for another Con-
gress ; and yet another, before he would
accept terms so unjust, dishonorable and
degrading to our people. He would
stand by the Constitution and the Pres-
ident to the last-giE^lV'-/,'.;;!--.'':;
Wo
jsllP
!*m
wa
i to what our
. It is un-
whom
born we
IcGinnis, could riot and would not sup-
port Gen. Throckmorton for Governor?
We are loth to do Judge McGinnis
injustice, but we wo uld forfeit our self-
respect, did wo sit still and not speak, at
this time, when deception is so rife and
e people «¡o hungry for truth.
*
?h* Amend* Constitution We
call the attention of our readers to the
comiaimic&tiou oí Maior Jamos AiVtalH
w% . «MUMIVUVIVM V *MO|Vl ÜWU'TO AlUUkU
of Nacogdoches, in reference to the amen-
to ded Constitution. Maj. Arnold is neitter
a lawyer, a politician nor an aspirant for
■■¡■¡■■■■HI
on. V
ana t
ut he is one of the
practical men in'this State, and
subject he
farmer,
ments of tho radical dUunionista that we
aro " traitors and secessionists ? >§||t is
those true, those wholo-souled uniou
men who, trampling passion and preju-
dice tinder foot, are nobly battling by our
sido for our Constitutional rights. There
are Judge Smith aud Wash Jones, Mr,
Throckmorton, Mr. Epperson, Judge
Hancock, Judge Evans, Gen. Norton and
a host of glorious names, who are now
«tending nobly by us. Each of these
names is & tow^t;.-j^ |
Wit bout them :Wp¡Pt>
nmph numerically t but our victory would
carry no moral weight.. Scorned, libel-
led, denounced and lorded over by Ham-
ilton and hia followers, it is to these true
Union look to bear evidence in
our behalf. Tbey stand exhibiting, its
tbey do, their confidence in us, and wo,
¡n return, trusting them, day by day, ft
living witnesses for our truth and loyal-
ty. In the face of this, can WO desert
JUaptTJfflltnwTtnouxwrvertngoureetvw
with perfidy 1 Who is there on the tick~
et more honest or more capable? Wbo
has given us such preciout hostages for
bis sincerity and truth ? Let the people
respond in June next by tbeir generous
support of Judgo Smith. Let his name
be omitted from no Conservative Union
ticket. His defeat, depend upon it, will
be charged against us, and our enemies
wili assert tbat he was beaten because he
was not a secessionist,:'! How Cftn S^ u
swer the charge} and how, in case of his
defeat, can you reply to the further
charge that you have broken faith with
Judge Smith 1 That he trusted us, and
Judas-like, we betrayed him because of
hié fll^ftdclity to the Unlq ? Are we
blind, or are we mád ? Aie we the only
people to tho world who can leaf# noth-
ing by experience ?
of Judge Smith will be a
tbe Kadioais here to pre-
iaen, who wii« ooropstont., e «M
the offices as well as rich mon, or
itical adventurers, who would misuse
r positions when attained, lie would
ive preferred $5000 for the Governor's
ary. A Govéfqpr could save little at
,t, and livo and entertain as the people
ed he would. It was of great ira
nee that tb'e Judges of tho District
Cdnrts should be good men and able law
yere. No other officer in the State
could compare with them, in the iryury
or benefit- which they might be to the
e. The persons and property of all
in tho bands of the District Judges,
and ignorant ones might imprison
when innocent } deprive them of
property unjustly, and put them
sad tbe State to great trouble and ox
pense by prolonging tbe Courtn &c
Good ones could not oe had without
paying them well. What lawyer, imfull
and profitable practice^wouid létve it to
go on the Bench, whew be could not get
enough to support himself arid /fámíly'
The people would gain pecuniarily and
otherwise by adopting tbe proposed
éndments. On the whole, tbe action
the Convention, which Wtts the result
of compromise and conciliation, was sat
Isfactory to him.
udge next spoke of hi# mission
ngton. JHe had not sought the
and bad accepted it with
hope of doing some gobd. Tbe com
nissioners had been kindly received by
the President. His own speech and the
ily were before tbe publio,
President, What
ed, that the people oif Texas
yal to the Government, and honestly
to bp restored to their former
rtiiftlioiis to It. The President liad ex
the wish, that they would jferse-
ero Tn their good conduct and patiently
for time and circumstances to ac-
plish this desirable end. Some
e newspapers bad sneered at ajl this,
a small concern, in this city, bad
ed it "cold oomfort." He thought
otherwise. He was pleased with the
reception given tbe Coptmissioners, and
believed the President was a Inend to
tbe people of Texas. The same paper
Allusion to tbe $800 be bad
Commissioner. It had sot
to cover hi expenses,
amount paid to the
to Washington
might have done
pi.-'-.. • *-..
Smith,
plained
winding sheet, that better i
political burial. It
HHMHi nihil A fe
angi
have aimed to give
speech in our own, It was well received
and, at times, with marked approbation
and applause. The Judge will address
his fellow citizens at Georgetown to-day,
and at San Antonio,.tbe Thursday pre-
vious to the election, as will be snen by
the correspondence published in this
issue.
Hl||
The Pease tail Of the Radical Rump,
having lost'joint after joint, has finally
shriveled down to its last wrinkle. The
main joint, «baking off its Texas apRpn
doges, has rejoined'tbe parent Rump,
leaving behind it a tinkling bell, that
stiil jingles few feeble, cofused and
discordant notes in tbe ears of its follow-
er . The head of the serpent, having
been crushed by the club of Conserva
tism, is rendered foul and unhealthy, in
the eyes of tlje people, by tho deadly
poison it distilled and spluttered forth;
the poor tail, with its rattling symbol,
after a few more vibrations, must go the
way of all Radical flesh—it too, will bo
gathered to its fatj^rs. The hand full of
miscegenation fiitb, eiied from the Sum
per sewer, and scattered over Western
Texas, to dirty and infect the land, h^s
been exhaled and dissipated by tbe puri-
fying influences of SBÉtftorvattMikaár ti
tttberent, ineradicable eoriviction of t,
whiter, that their race is superior to, and
distinct from, tbe African. A single
atom attempted to germinate in this lo
cality, but was summarily nqutkhtd by
tbe true manhood of soldiers, who, true
to tho dignity of their race; to their
Caucasian blood, repudiated the black,
and visited, with their severest displeas-
ure, the Radical scoundrel who sought to
dishonor them. Thus will it ever be,
where the Anglo-Saxon, or Anglo-Amer-
ioan blood predomínate . Tbat blood
will ever assert its supremacy when
brought in contact with either the negro,
or negropholist. Neither its Saxon,
American or Germanic currents will
mingle and commingle, upoa an equality,
with that of the negro. Yet, such is tbe
ultimate aim, tho end, the fundamental
idea, of tho Radical Republicans. It- is
to work out this hellish purpose, that
the African Idol has been enshrined in
the halls of the National Capital; it is to
work out this dark destiny, that the
Representatives of^ eleven
States are excluded' from tbe present
Congress; it is forvtbis, that the Consti
tution has been infracted, the laws oí
the land set at defiance; tbe President
branded as a traitor ; the Government
•ought to be consolidated,
Southern whites disfranchised and plun-
dered. No wonder the Pea^jtoil of tbe
Radical Rump, with all its bewitching
twirls and twitehings, has not only iguo-
miniously failed to persuade or frighten
our people into giving their assistance to
such a work of demoralization, butthat
it has switched itself to pieces under the
assaults of the hostile elements that sur-
Pound it. Repudiated, dismembered
t he joint that connected St with the par-
entílj&áÜrip fled the country, tbe poor
thing lies helpless at its last gasp, with
scarcely life enough to palpitate, with
none but its sickly Executive Committee
to chant its last requiem, and, ala* ¿ nose
but lis tinkling bell to toll it to the
grave. . ' \ m^S9F
that paper announced its pu
port Smith, Donley, Moore, Coke and
rlill for tho Supreme Bench. Shortly
fter, it published and endorsed a eulogy
of the Civillian's on tbe Judicial nomi-
nees. Up to this time not a murmer of
discontent or disapproval; not a''Word
•gainst Mr. Donley or Judge Smith ap-
peared in the Telegraph, though the
Hamilton lettep, signed by Judge Smith,
bad been published in it columns. Judge
HiU, for ¿atisfsctory reasons, declines to
run. Immediately the Telegraph discov-
erá|||$jjit "Mr. Donley has no strength,"
is dissatisfied with Judge Smith, and
drops them both I The logric of the Tel-
egraph is this: /rfítyí HPl decline to
run, therefore, we will break faith witb
Messrs. Smith and Donley,
this time, we have been earnestly sup-
porting. This is as fair a specimeu of a
non scqvitur, we think, as can be pro-
duced. But he does not stop here.
Having abandoned both Messrs. Smith
and Donley, it opens a war on tbe form-
er gentleman, on account Of the Call on
Hamilton, the exact effect of which, no
one understood better than tbe Telegraph,
and after which call it had beeUsnppurt-
¡ng Judge Smith
mean
name to the Telegraph fof
of making war on the Regular Ticket,
.. Judge Devine, in the
while, being unwilling to lend hia
declines to run. Then the Telegraph
with the speed of lightning; hoists again
the name of tbe despised Donley, and
says it dropt him without reason, and
never had anything against bim. _
further and says, it can't swallow Judge
Smith this tine, but will take pleasure in
supporting bim her eofter. We submit
that this plain statement of the course
,<rfUbe Telegraph, should cause, the pao-
pie to distrust its judgment as to Judge
Smith. If he waa competent in the
opinion of that paper in May, why is ho
not competent now 1 If he can be trust
ed "hereafter," as the Telegraph asserts,
why can he not bo trusted now ?
We submit these views, to enable the
people to judge this matter fairly. In
conclusion, we reiterate what we stated
when this discussion, as to the Judicial
Ticket, commenced—we have rio desire
for any controversy %itb our friend of
the « Telegraph. Bat feeling convinced
that bis course endangered the fifeeess of
tbe Regular Ticket, which, but for him,
was certain, we folt bound to speak.
Furthermore, wo felt certain that a war
waged on Judge Smith, the only original
Union man on tbe Judicial Ticket, was
just what our enemies wished, and we
endeavored to put a stop to itv
District Attorney.
« It is with a degree of hesitation that
we say a word in this racé. But being
convinced that as it now stands, antil
Without a concentration on* one of tbe
four gentlemen who represent the Con
servativo side, success will be with th<
candidate who Las affiliated and who
now affiliates with the faction of radicals
in our midst, wo have no right to remain
sileut. Tbe full strength of that organ-
ized faction will be east for eacl
ife candidates, the candidate for
Attorney among others.
There are but few more important po-
n
sitions in tho country at this day, than
,who
g the coun
the people of that
ng or conte
did so, not It
Hlfto
imt to avoid
equality the Radicals were attempting to
'isten on the people of'the State of
'exas. He avowed himself the friend of
Mr, Johnson^ reoon*truction policy a
well as tbe unc^|temisinpop,ponent of
all the Radical measures, which have for
r objeet, the degredation and humili-
ation of tbe Southern people. 1 .
Col. Ireland will receive tho full con-
servativo vote of the District nd not *■
solitary Radical-one.
Attorney Ge «ral.
The following Newspapers support .
Maj. W. M. Walton for Attorney Gene-
ral: •
Telegraph, Rusk Observer, Liberty
lazette; Colorado Citizen, Brenham En-
iiirer, La Grange True Issue, Goliad
iessenger, Victoria Advocate, Ssn Anto-
nio Herald, San Antonio Ledger, Western ;
Texian, State Gaswtte, Waco Register
and Dallas Herald.
From this it is evident that Maj.
ton is the strongest man, before the p>o
pie for this office, and we trust that an
effort will be made, throughout the State,
to concentrate on hit the whole Con-
servative Union vote. Let not this be for-
gotten.
^■j. JSMi -.III
We call attention to the annexed let-
ter of Mr. Walton's, in reference to. the
charge made by the Telegraph, that
Judge Smith denounced the ex-Confed-
eratwi as "nmrderm."
j* an elect-
ioneering charge, put out for tbe purpose
of exciting a prejudice in tbe iriind* of
the ex Confederate against J udge Smith.
Judge Smith is tbe onlv original Union
man on our Judicial Ticket, he is our
friend and we can troMt btm.
Austin, June 12tb, 1866.
J$(fttor Telegraph: J,
During tho Convention I was corres-
pondent of your paper, and, as such, waa
a constant attendant at the sessi ■ '
that body. I heard every speech
in the Convention.
I beard every speech madsfeby the
Hon. Geo W. Smith, during the Con-
vention, and he did not, during that time,
make one in which he denounced t$&||
"Confederate soldiers as murderew," nor
did^ie use language^akin to this. _
by attribiting to him. such
Yonr informant is in error ! grossly so!
Tbe strongest speech maue in the Con-
yent.ion, condemnatory of the manner tfc
which the Federals made war against us,
was made by Judge Smith.
B n WALTom
si*
Si
wm
n
i
K JoMX
I concur with Mr. Wiüton io
stajement, as to Judge Smith.
it^Tlhe Telegraph of the 11th
has unotber misrepresentation of
Smith. It says, that because
was in favor of declaring the <
secession voidaii initio, that he is
and voady to declare all. the
duriug secession null «id void and of no
effect. The fact V that ^Judge Smith
tase pavor.
■: r /T 9
15 3VHGH ItlcOmNtS. '■
If this gentleman baa not thrown him-
self fully into the arms of the Hamilton-
Peiwe faction, wby doe he not publUh
tho tiorrespondence between himself and
on. That
that of District Attorney—as such it de-
mands the attention of tho people. The
Conservative gentlemen running are Mess-
rs. S. G, Sneeid, John Rector, W. O.
Hutchinson and J. H., Burts. Each was
a soldier in the war, and did his duty or
what be thought was his duty. Sneed
and Rector on the East,
Burts on the West, side <
ther one would make an
All are well read, honest, energetic
faithful. Efforts bay# been made to af-
fect harmony between these gentlemen
foi the purpose of running but one mi
for this offiee, on our side, as does t
well organized radicáis. No matter w*
tbe effort
blame attaching to an j. named man;
P delivered the ablest
Xrict Convention, to show
ernmónt.e lie has invs
tbe bench in his Dis
seema determined
Smith. We correct in
its misstatements. J
dition, was one of the
of tbe celebrated
that Hamilton
"murderers" from
OHS
he
c.:?™
We warn
We warn
U 7> . t: •
. ' p
''if:- - ' ;
|l(^P||<|(l|i|ii|l|^J|ipi| Ililpii I'll'
liiMaaaiM
on
mJ
two of
in ad-fS
pal frmera
ordinsnce,
shielding
view On
I " '
■■ -v.:''"ri!N
" I \ 'v !|
V y
o:., '■ v?' r
:,j,
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
The Weekly State Gazette. (Austin, Tex.), Vol. 17, No. 39, Ed. 1 Saturday, June 16, 1866, newspaper, June 16, 1866; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth181630/m1/2/: accessed June 12, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History.